tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8584493.post3773384588023897131..comments2009-04-02T14:42:32.181-07:00Joyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04748355538825811136noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8584493.post-1323645725543333912009-04-02T14:16:00.000-07:002009-04-02T14:16:00.000-07:00You do know the paper and Examiner.com are not the same thing, right? Examiner.com espouses no political affiliation and does not, like a paper, endorse candidates.<BR/><BR/>Just sayin' . . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8584493.post-90486100397376058262008-10-22T08:40:00.000-07:002008-10-22T08:40:00.000-07:00I've always thought that paper sucked and now I know for sure. How can they say that stuff with a straight face.Alice Q. Foodiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13477466400681164056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8584493.post-66229102845446441782008-09-29T08:51:00.000-07:002008-09-29T08:51:00.000-07:00Holy fuck?!? The Republicans have nearly destroyed the United States for the personal gain of a couple of very wealthy campaign contributors, and now the Examiner endorses two more to finish the job? How does the United States benefit from the election of an early-stage Alzheimer's patient and someone who believes that the story of Noah's Ark is literally true?coyotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00384839859155271546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8584493.post-26377210977144313302008-09-25T17:34:00.000-07:002008-09-25T17:34:00.000-07:00i love you, insult me please and keep writingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com